Bacteria
have no sexual reproduction in the sense that eukaryotes do. The have
But
the essence of sex is genetic recombination, and bacteria do have three
mechanisms to accomplish that:
- transformation
- conjugation
- transduction
Many
bacteria can acquire new genes by taking up DNA molecules (e.g., a plasmid) from their surroundings. The ability to deliberately
transform the bacterium E. coli has made possible the cloning of many genes — including
human genes — and the development of the biotechnology industry.
The
first demonstration of bacterial transformation was done with Streptococcus pneumoniae and led to the discovery that DNA
is the substance of the genes. The path leading to this epoch-making discovery
began in 1928 with the work of an English bacteriologist, Fred Griffith.
The cells of S. pneumoniae
(also known as the pneumococcus) are usually surrounded by a gummy capsule made
of a polysaccharide. When grown on the surface of a solid culture medium, the
capsule causes the colonies to have a glistening, smooth appearance. These
cells are called "S" cells.
Streptococcus
pneumoniae
(pneumococci) growing as colonies on the surface of a culture medium. Left:
The presence of a capsule around the bacterial cells gives the colonies a
glistening, smooth (S) appearance. Right: Pneumococci lacking capsules
have produced these rough (R) colonies. (Courtesy of Robert Austrian, J.
Exp. Med. 98:21, 1953.)
|
|
However,
after prolonged cultivation on artificial medium, some cells lose the ability
to form the capsule, and the surface of their colonies is wrinkled and rough ("R").
With the loss of their capsule, the bacteria also lose their virulence.
Injection of a single S pneumococcus into a mouse will kill the mouse in
24 hours or so. But an injection of over 100 million (100 x 106) R
cells is entirely harmless.
|
Encapsulated
(left) and nonencapsulated (right) pneumococci. The encapsulated forms
produce smooth colonies (above). (Courtesy of Robert Austrian, J. Exp.
Med. 98:21, 1953.)
|
|
The
reason? The capsule prevents the pneumococci from being engulfed and destroyed
by scavenging cells — neutrophils and macrophages — in the body. The R forms are completely at the mercy of
phagocytes.
Pneumococci also occur in over 90 different types: I, II, III
and so on. The types differ in the chemistry of their polysaccharide capsule.
Unlike
the occasional shift of S -> R, the type of the organism is constant. Mice
injected with a few S cells of, say, Type II pneumococci, will soon have their
bodies teeming with descendant cells of the same type.
However,
Griffith found that when living R cells (which should have been
harmless) and dead S cells (which also should have been harmless) were
injected together, the mouse became ill and living S cells could be
recovered from its body. Furthermore, the type of the cells recovered
from the mouse's body was determined by the type of the dead S cells. In the
experiment shown, injection of
- living
R-I cells and
- dead
S-II cells
produced
a dying mouse with its body filled with living S-II pneumococci.
The
S-II cells remained true to their new type. Something in the dead S-II cells
had made a permanent change in the phenotype of the R-I cells. The process was named transformation.
Oswald Avery and his colleagues at The Rockefeller Institute in New York
City eventually showed that the "something" was DNA.
In
pursuing Griffith's discovery, they found that they could bring about the same
kind of transformation in vitro using an extract of the bacterial cells.
Treating
this extract with
- enzymes
to destroy all polysaccharides (including the polysaccharide
of the capsule)
- a
lipase to destroy any lipids
- proteases
to destroy all proteins
- RNase
to destroy RNA
did
not destroy the ability of their extracts to transform the bacteria.
But
treating the extracts with DNase to destroy the DNA in them did abolish
their transforming activity. So DNA was the only material in the dead cells
capable of transforming cells from one type to another. DNA was the
substance of genes.
Although
the chemical composition of the capsule is determined by genes, the
relationship is indirect. DNA is transcribed into RNA and RNA is translated into proteins. The phenotype of the pneumococci — the
chemical composition of the polysaccharide capsule — is determined by the
particular enzymes (proteins) used in polysaccharide synthesis.
Some
bacteria, E. coli is an example, can transfer a portion of their chromosome
to a recipient with which they are in direct contact. As the donor replicates
its chromosome, the copy is injected into the recipient. At any time that the
donor and recipient become separated, the transfer of genes stops. Those genes
that successfully made the trip replace their equivalents in the recipient's
chromosome.
- Can
only occur between cells of opposite mating types.
- The
donor (or "male") carries a fertility factor (F+).
- The
recipient ("female") does not (F−).
- F
- is
a set of genes originally acquired from a plasmid and now integrated into
the bacterial chromosome;
- establishes
the origin of replication for the chromosome.
- A
portion of F is the "locomotive" that pulls the chromosome into
the recipient cell.
- The
rest of it is the "caboose".
- In E.
coli, about one gene gets across each second that the cells remain
together. (So, it takes about 100 min for the entire genome (4377 genes) to make it. But,
- the
process is easily interrupted so
- it
is more likely that host genes close behind the leading F genes
("locomotive") will make it than those farther back
- The
"caboose" seldom makes it so failing to receive a complete F factor,
the recipient cell continues to be "female"
- The
DNA that makes it across finds the homologous region on the female
chromosome and replaces it (by a double crossover).
- By
deliberately separating the cells (in a kitchen blender) at different
times, the order and relative spacing of the genes can be determined. In
this way, a genetic map — equivalent to the genetic maps of eukaryotes —
can be made. But here the map intervals are seconds, not centimorgans
(cM).
- The
"male" lacks functional genes needed to synthesize the vitamin biotin and the amino acid methionine (Bio−, Met−) so these must be
added to its culture medium.
- The
"female" has those genes (Bio+, Met+) but
has nonfunctional (mutant) genes that prevent it from being able to
synthesize the amino acids threonine and leucine (Thr−, Leu−) so these must be
added to its culture medium).
- When
cultured together, some female cells receive the functional Thr and
Leu genes from the male donor.
- A
double crossover enables them to replace the nonfunctional alleles.
- Now
the cells now can grow on a "minimal" medium containing only glucose and
salts.
Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria.
In the process of assembling new virus particles, some host DNA may be
incorporated in them.
The
virion head can hold only so much DNA so these viruses
- while
still able to infect new host cells
- may
be unable to lyze them.
Instead
the hitchhiker bacterial gene (or genes) may be inserted into the DNA of the
new host, replacing those already there and giving the host an altered phenotype. This phenomenon is called transduction.
Transformation,
conjugation, and transduction were discovered in the laboratory. How important
are these mechanisms of genetic recombination in nature? We don't really know,
but
Some
thoughts:
- The
completion of the sequence of the entire genome of a variety of different bacteria (and archaea)
suggest that genes have in the past moved from one species to another.
This phenomenon is called lateral gene transfer (LGT).
- The
remarkable spread of resistance to multiple antibiotics may have been aided by the
transfer of resistance genes within populations and even between species.
- Many
bacteria have enzymes that enable them to destroy foreign DNA that gets
into their cells. It seem unlikely that these would be needed if that did
not occur in nature. In any case, these restriction enzymes have
provided the tools upon which the advances of molecular biology and the
biotechnology industry depend.
The
understanding of complex systems almost always has to await unraveling the
details of some simpler system. You may feel that trying to find out how one
type of pneumococcus could be converted into another was an exceedingly
specialized and esoteric pursuit. But Avery and his coworkers realized the broader
significance of what they were observing and, in due course, the rest of the
scientific world did as well. By electing to work with a well-defined system:
the conversion of R forms of one type into S forms of a different type, these
researchers made a discovery that has revolutionized biology and medicine.
Attempting
to understand the workings of complex systems by first understanding the
workings of their parts is called reductionism. Some scientists (and
many nonscientists) question the value of reductionism. They favor a holistic
approach emphasizing the workings of the complete system.
But
the record speaks for itself. From skyscrapers to moon walks, to computer chips
to the advances of modern medicine, progress comes from first understanding the
properties of the parts that make up the whole.
The
late George Wald, who won the 1967 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for
his discoveries of the molecular basis of detecting light, once worried that
his work was overly specialized — studying not vision, not the eye, not the
whole retina, not even their rods and cones, but just the chemical reactions of
their rhodopsins. But he came to realize "it is as though this were a very
narrow window through which at a distance one can see only a crack of light. As
one comes closer, the view grows wider and wider, until finally through this
same window one is looking at the universe. I think this is the way it always
goes in science, because science is all one. It hardly matters where one
enters, provided one can come closer....".